Like with any camera that is digital/electronic, you get instantaneous results on what you are shooting through the lens. So that is a plus. Please keep in mind that the rest of this will be to discuss the benefits of RED video versus other forms of video. And this is not to be mistaken as a comparison of film versus video discussion.
Okay. So like any other independent filmmaker out there, I’ve tested a gamut of video formats and they all have their pros and their cons.
But I don’t want to get into a giant blog post about the pros and cons of all of them, cause I don’t have time and I want to edit
So just benefits of R3D. Last time, I posted about specific problems of post production workflow with R3D. Well, it’s more of an obstacle/annoyance than problem.
OKAY OKAY benefits of shooting on RED. I got sidetrack with my doppleganger picture on facebook.
1.) Ability to use 16mm and 35mm gauge Lenses. (KEEP IN MIND, if you use 16mm you can only shoot at 2K resolution instead of 35mm at 4K. So you get the depth of field of 16 and 35mm without shooting on film. Also, the markings on the focus are accurate. RED allows you to do back focus but proceed with caution. Because you shouldn’t shift back focus without expert technicians. This is superior to the 35mm still lens adapters because all the focus marks are accurate and you are not just focusing off the monitor.
2.) 320 gig HD. At 4K resolution you can fit more than 3 hours of footage (depending on whether you shoot 23.98, 24, 25, 29.97, 50, or 59.94 fps). That means you most likely will not have to change your mag daily. So less time spend during the shoot prepping the camera.
3.) R3D format. I don’t exactly understand the full details of the math behind R3D format, but it is RAW. Which means that ASA, White balance… and et cetera are all metadata. This means that R3D reacts the same way as a RAW still photo. All that information can be adjusted in postproduction as if you made the decisions on set. (Of course, you still need an experienced Director of Photography to get the compositions and lighting that you want.)
4.) 4K resolution. It means, whenever I get the money, I can export 4K to a film printer and get a print of my movie that will feel like a 35mm film that went through a DI. It won’t have to feel like it was uprez’d to fit a 35mm image. (When I get the money. This process is approximately $250/min for the final 35mm print. But that’s not counting the color timing you go through for the export.)
5.) The offline edit is still in HD. I had to transcode to prorez and it took me a while. But I figured it out and I’m glad to be editing in HD still. This process is doable with other formats such as HD CAM SR. But my macbook pro did the trancoding and not an HD CAM deck. Which saved me $300/hr.
6.) It’s a cheap format to shoot on that gets you 35mm like resolution and quality.
I’m sure i’m forgetting things. But these are the reasons why shooting on the RED is beneficial to me.
Posted by lammermyre 









